HUAWEI AND THE US-CHINA TRADE WAR: TECHNO-NATIONALISM AND THE STRUGGLE FOR GLOBAL HEGEMONY
Keywords:
US-China, trade war, Huawei, 5G, techno-nationalism, weaponized interdependenceAbstract
This paper examines the United States–China trade war through the lens of Huawei
Technologies, focusing on the intersection of trade, technology, and geopolitical rivalry. Using a
qualitative approach to secondary data, the study situates Huawei at the epicenter of a contest
over fifth-generation (5G) telecommunications infrastructure and its strategic implications.
Drawing on the mercantilist tradition and the contemporary framework of techno-nationalism,
the paper argues that Huawei’s rise as a global technology leader has amplified U.S. concerns
over economic security, intellectual property, and global influence. Findings suggest that the
trade war has resulted in significant trade diversion, export losses, and shifts in global supply
chains, while reinforcing a new era of “weaponized interdependence” in international relations.
The paper concludes that the Huawei case illustrates how advanced technologies now function
not only as economic assets but as geopolitical bargaining chips in great power competition.The
paper explores the United States-China trade war through the lens of Huawei while focusing on
trade, geo politics, technology and history of long political rivalry. The paper will use qualitative
approach in secondary data, the study explains how Huawei a Chinese Tele-communication giant
and a pioneer of the 5G technology found its self at the epicenter of this conflict as well as the
implications. The economic theory of mercantilism will be utilized as a framework in explaining
techno-nationalism. The paper argues that the rise of Huawei has a global tech leader has
prompted US concern over intellectual property right, privacy, security, economic security as
well as security and surveillance. This sheds light of the dynamic shift of global influence from
the Western Block (US) to the Eastern Block (China). The Trade war has resulted in significant
trade diversion, shifts in supply chain and economic sabotage while reinforcing a new
“weaponized interdependence” in International relations. Finally, the case of Huawei illustrates
how the advanced technologies now function not only as economic assets, but also as bargaining
chips. The age of warfare has changed significantly post 1945, armored tanks; gun and
ammunition has been replaced with cyber warfare and economic warfare. The 21st Century
presents a different style of warfare among nation, this study carefully highlights that. The back-
bone of every nation is its economy, wealth means power in international relations, and the trade
war is simply a nation’s pursuit of its National interest/Foreign policy.